ORIGINAL PAPER
Dynamics of microbial contamination of protein during ruminal in situ incubation of feedstuffs
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Rostock, Institute for Farm Animal Sciences and Technology, 18051 Rostock, Germany
 
2
Research Institute for the Biology of Farm Animals, Department of Nutritional Physiology “Oskar Kellner”, W.-Stahl-Allee 2, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
 
3
The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, 05-110 Jabłonna, Poland
 
 
Publication date: 2006-04-12
 
 
Corresponding author
M. Gabel   

University of Rostock, Institute for Farm Animal Sciences and Technology, 18051 Rostock, Germany
 
 
J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2006;15(2):313-328
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to determine the dynamics of bacterial contamination of feedstuffs during ruminal in situ incubation and to quantify the effects of bacterial contamination on the ruminal in situ degradation of crude protein (CP). Two different approaches using 15N as a marker were followed, namely: 1. 15N-labelled rumen bacteria in combination with unlabelled feedstuffs and 2. 15N-labelling of feeds while leaving rumen bacteria unlabelled. Using the nylon bag technique, a total of 31 feedstuffs was incubated in the rumen of 3 steers. Both marker methods gave in principle similar results. The course of bacterial contamination was best described by an exponential function of the general type A=Amax [1–exp (-C·t)], where A denotes bacterial contamination (% of residue N), Amax is the maximum of bacterial contamination for t ≈ ∞, C is the rate of contamination [%·h- 1] and t denotes the incubation time (h). The Amax values of most cereals ranged from 32 to 38% of the residue N. For roughages and straw, Amax reaches 45 to 100%. Amax, but not C, is significantly positively influenced by the NDF content in feedstuffs (P=0.049). The CP content of feedstuffs negatively affects C (P=0.006). The proportion of bacterial CP of total CP within the in situ bag residues was used to correct the apparent CP degradation rate. This correction was numerically lowest for protein concentrates and grains (0 to 3%) and highest for roughages (up to 50%). In conclusion, correction of ruminal protein degradation for bacterial contamination is necessary, especially for roughages. For cereal grains and protein concentrates it seems to be irrelevant.
 
CITATIONS (25):
1.
Chemical composition, rumen degradability and crude protein fractionation of some commercial and improved cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) haulm varieties
U. Y. Anele, K.-H. Südekum, O. M. Arigbede, H. Lüttgenau, A. O. Oni, O. J. Bolaji, M. L. Galyean
Grass and Forage Science
 
2.
Estimating ruminal crude protein degradation of forages using in situ and in vitro techniques
B. Edmunds, K.-H. Südekum, H. Spiekers, F.J. Schwarz
Animal Feed Science and Technology
 
3.
Ruminal fermentation characteristics and microbial nitrogen assimilation in sheep fed differently composed grass silages
Katharina Seip, Gerhard Breves, Johannes Isselstein, Gürbüz Daş, Hansjörg Abel
Archives of Animal Nutrition
 
4.
Effects of microbial colonization in the rumen on concentration and degradability estimates of fibre fractions
J.M. Arroyo, J. González
Livestock Science
 
5.
Effects of the ruminal comminution rate and microbial contamination of particles on accuracy ofin situestimates of ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of feedstuffs
J. M. Arroyo, J. González
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
 
6.
Stage of lactation and corresponding diets affect in situ protein degradation by dairy cows
I. Schadt, D.R. Mertens, P.J. Van Soest, G. Azzaro, G. Licitra
Journal of Dairy Science
 
7.
Effect of extent and rate of wilting on nitrogen components of grass silage
B. Edmunds, H. Spiekers, K.-H. Südekum, H. Nussbaum, F. J. Schwarz, R. Bennett
Grass and Forage Science
 
8.
The amino acid composition of rumen-undegradable protein: A comparison between forages
B. Edmunds, K.-H. Südekum, R. Bennett, A. Schröder, H. Spiekers, F.J. Schwarz
Journal of Dairy Science
 
9.
Effects of ensiling onin situruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of corn forage
Javier González, Jesús Faría-Mármol, José María Arroyo, Carmen Centeno, Adela Martínez
Archives of Animal Nutrition
 
10.
Ruminal degradation of cell wall associated nitrogenous compounds of several15N-labelled feeds
Jorge L Vanegas, José M Arroyo, Javier González
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
 
11.
Amino acid profiles of rumen undegradable protein: a comparison between forages including cereal straws and alfalfa and their respective total mixed rations
B. Wang, L. S. Jiang, J. X. Liu
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
 
12.
Ruminal dry matter and crude protein degradation kinetics of five sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop) accessions differing in condensed tannin content and obtained from different harvests
B.N. Azuhnwi, B. Thomann, Y. Arrigo, B. Boller, H.D. Hess, M. Kreuzer, F. Dohme-Meier
Animal Feed Science and Technology
 
13.
Effect of variety and harvest date on nutritive value and ruminal degradability of ensiled maize ears
Georg Terler, Leonhard Gruber, Wilhelm Friedrich Knaus
Archives of Animal Nutrition
 
14.
Does microbial nitrogen contamination affect the estimation of crude protein degradability of concentrate feeds?1
A. C. B. Menezes, S. C. Valadares Filho, P. P. Rotta, S. A. Santos, M. V. C. Pacheco, B. C. Silva, P. Pucetti, H. M. Alhadas, E. Detmann, J. S. Caton
Journal of Animal Science
 
15.
Comparison of three 15N methods to correct for microbial contamination when assessing in situ protein degradability of fresh forages1
M. Kamoun, H. Ammar, A. Théwis, Y. Beckers, J. France, S. López
Journal of Animal Science
 
16.
Development of equations to estimate microbial contamination in ruminal incubation residues of forage produced under tropical conditions using 15N as a label1
P. A. S. Machado, S. C. Valadares Filho, E. Detmann, S. A. Santos, R. F. D. Valadares, C. Ducatti, P. P. Rotta, L. F. Costa e Silva
Journal of Animal Science
 
17.
Nutrient composition, ruminal degradability and whole tract digestibility of whole crop maize silage from nine current varieties
Leonhard Gruber, Georg Terler, Wilhelm Knaus
Archives of Animal Nutrition
 
18.
Nutritive value of ensiled maize stover from nine different varieties harvested at three different stages of maturity
Georg Terler, Leonhard Gruber, Wilhelm F. Knaus
Grass and Forage Science
 
19.
Effects of inclusion of purple prairie clover (Dalea purpurea Vent.) with native cool-season grasses on in vitro fermentation and in situ digestibility of mixed forages
Kai Peng, Gemma Gresham, Tim McAllister, Zhongjun Xu, Alan Iwaasa, Mike Schellenberg, Alex Chaves, Yuxi Wang
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
 
20.
Development of equations to estimate microbial nitrogen contamination in rumen incubation residues using 15N data and chemical composition of feedstuffs
E. Parand, J.W. Spek
Animal Feed Science and Technology
 
21.
In situ and in vitro determination of the protein value of feeds for ruminants
Christiane Rupp, Edwin Westreicher-Kristen, Andreas Susenbeth
Archives of Animal Nutrition
 
22.
Evaluating the Protein Value of Fresh Tropical Forage Grasses and Forage Legumes Using In Vitro and Chemical Fractionation Methods
Khaterine Salazar-Cubillas, Uta Dickhoefer
Animals
 
23.
Effect of Wilting and Lactic Acid Bacteria Inoculant On in situ and in vitro Determined Protein Value of Grass Silages
C. Rupp, E. Westreicher-Kristen, A. Susenbeth
Animal Feed Science and Technology
 
24.
Estimating the proportion of in situ rumen-undegraded crude protein from chemical crude protein and fiber fractions in tropical forage grasses and legumes
K. Salazar-Cubillas, U. Dickhoefer
Animal Feed Science and Technology
 
25.
Feed Clusters According to In Situ and In Vitro Ruminal Crude Protein Degradation
Paul Okon, Martin Bachmann, Monika Wensch-Dorendorf, Natascha Titze, Markus Rodehutscord, Christiane Rupp, Andreas Susenbeth, Jörg Greef, Annette Zeyner
Animals
 
ISSN:1230-1388
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top