1.054
IF5
1.150
IF
Q3
JCR
1.7
CiteScore
0.396
SJR
Q2
SJR
40
MNiSW
148.75
ICV
ORIGINAL PAPER
 
CC-BY 4.0
 
 

A four-generation feeding study with genetically modified (Bt) maize in laying hens

I. Halle 1,  
 
1
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Friedrich Loeffler Institute (FLI), Federal Research Institute of Animal Health, Bundesallee 50, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2014;23(1):58–63
Publication date: 2014-03-03
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
A four-generation study with at least 60 laying hens (LSL) and 10 cockerels (LSL) was carried out to investigate the influence of genetically modified maize (Bt 176) on animal health and feed intake, laying performance, feed efficiency, and hatchability of chickens and to compare GM-maize with its near isogenic counterpart. The chickens were divided into two groups (one pen/group) of at least 30 hens each and 3 cockerels. The diets contained 400 (chickens and pullets) or 500 g · kg–1 (laying hens) isogenic or genetically modified maize (Bt 176), respectively. Feed and water were provided ad libitum. Eggs for hatching were collected when the laying hen was aged 31 weeks. In the 31st week of life, brooding eggs were collected and brooded for every group. One-day-old chickens from each group were sex sorted and allocated to one pen per group. There were no significant differences in composition between the two maize varieties. For every generation, as well as the average of all four generations, there was no significant influence on the feed intake of chickens (32.2 and 32.0 g per day), pullets (68.4 and 70.4 g per day) and layers (114.9 and 112.9 g per hen per day for control and Bt-maize), body weight of chickens (652 and 636 g), pullets after 18 weeks (1316 and 1305 g), and laying hens after 31 weeks (1656 and 1626 g for control and Bt-maize), laying intensity (83.5% and 83.3%), fertility of eggs (96.6% and 97.5%), or hatchability of living chicks (86.8% and 88.0% for control and Bt-maize). In conclusion, feeding of 400 (grower) or 500 g · kg–1 (layer period) Bt-maize to chickens, pullets and laying hens for four generations did not significantly influence feed intake, growth, laying or breeding performance compared with an isogenic counterpart.
 
CITATIONS (6):
1. Detection of DNA fragments from wheat in blood of animals
Václav Trojan, Tomáš Vyhnánek, Ondřej Štastník, Eva Mrkvicová, Jan Mareš, Ladislav Havel
Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit
2. Effects of feeding transgenic corn with mCry1Ac or maroACC gene to laying hens for 12 weeks on growth, egg quality and organ health
R. Q. Zhong, L. Chen, L. X. Gao, L. L. Zhang, B. Yao, X. G. Yang, H. F. Zhang
animal
3. Genetically modified feeds and their effect on the metabolic parameters of food-producing animals: A review of recent studies
Sylwester Swiatkiewicz, Malgorzata Swiatkiewicz, Anna Arczewska-Wlosek, Damian Jozefiak
Animal Feed Science and Technology
4. Genetically Engineered Foods
Gerhard Flachowsky
5. Future challenges feeding transgenic plants
Gerhard Flachowsky, Tim Reuter
Animal Frontiers
6. Effects of genetically modified maize expressing Cry1Ab and EPSPS proteins on Japanese quail
Li Zhang, Wenjing Shen, Zhixiang Fang, Biao Liu
Poultry Science
ISSN:1230-1388