ORIGINAL PAPER
Figure from article: Effects of <i>Saccharomyces...
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to determine how Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation affects rumen microbial diversity and function in Pogasi (Peranakan Ongole Grati Hasil Seleksi) beef cattle. The treatment included a diet supplemented with 2 g of yeast per animal daily compared to a control unsupplemented diet, using a 2 × 2 Latin square design. Venn diagram analysis identified 536 core microbial genera common for all groups, while unique genera in yeast-supplemented groups indicated an effect on microbial composition and diversity. Yeast addition increased microbial richness, as shown by rarefaction curves, and improved species evenness, suggesting a more stable ecosystem. Taxonomic analysis revealed Firmicutes and Bacteroidota as the dominant phyla, with yeast supplementation inducing minor changes in microbial composition. At the class level, Methanobacteria, Clostridia, and Bacteroidia were predominant, with a slight reduction in Methanobacteria in yeast-supplemented groups, suggesting a potential inhibitory effect on methanogenesis. Functional analysis showed alterations in metabolic pathways related to fibre degradation, volatile fatty acid production, and nitrogen metabolism. These findings indicate that yeast supplementation modifies microbial structure, stabilises the rumen microbiome, and improves fermentation efficiency, potentially reducing methane emissions. This study demonstrates that yeast supplementation is a promising strategy to improve rumen function and sustainability in beef cattle production.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was supported by DIPA Loka Penelitian Sapi Potong, Ministry of Agriculture of Republic Indonesia, 2021. Registration Number No. ROPP: 018.09.KB.48585.SDA.543.052.A.1.2021. The authors express their sincere gratitude to the staff of the Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Agricultural Instrument Standardization Agency, and all parties who contributed to this research.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Aryogi, Pamungkas D., Efendy J., 2020. Formation and phenotypic performance of the new breed POGASI Agrinak cattle. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 492, 012106, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1....
 
2.
Betancur-Murillo C.L., Aguilar-Marín S.B., Jovel J., 2022. Prevotella: A key player in ruminal metabolism. Microorganisms 11, 1, https://doi.org/10.3390/microo....
 
3.
Callaway T.R., Martin S.A., Wampler J.L., 1997. Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on ruminal bacteria that utilize lactate and digest cellulose. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 2035–2044, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0....
 
4.
Chaucheyras-Durand F., Fonty G., 2001. Establishment of cellulolytic bacteria and development of fermentative activities in the rumen of gnotobiotically-reared lambs receiving the microbial additive Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077. Rep. Nutr. Dev. 41, 57–68, https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:20....
 
5.
Chaucheyras-Durand F., Walker N.D., Bach A., 2016. Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: past, present and future. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 219, 76–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anif....
 
6.
Dai D., Liu Y., Kong F., Guo C., Dong C., Xu X., Li S., Wang W., 2023. Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture’s dose response on ruminal nutrient digestibility and microbial community: an in vitro study. Fermentation 9, 411, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermen....
 
7.
Desnoyers M., Giger-Reverdin S., Bertin G., Duvaux-Ponter C., Sauvant D., 2009. Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. J. Dairy Sci. 92, 1620-1632, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.20....
 
8.
Elghandour M.M., Khusro A., Adegbeye M.J., Tan Z., Abu Hafsa S.H., Greiner R., Ugbogu E.A., Anele U.Y., Salem A.Z.M., 2020. Dynamic role of single-celled fungi in ruminal microbial ecology and activities. J. Appl. Microbiol. 128, 950–965, https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14....
 
9.
Geng C.Y., Ren L.P., Zhou Z.M., Chang Y., Meng Q.X., 2016. Comparison of active dry yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and yeast culture for growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality and blood indexes in finishing bulls. Anim. Sci. J. 87, 982–988, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12....
 
10.
Henderson G., Cox F., Ganesh S., Jonker A., Young W., Janssen P.J., 2015. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci. Rep. 5, 14567, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14....
 
11.
Jiao P.X., Ma F.C., Beauchemin K.A., AlZahal O., Xie X.L., Yang W.Z., 2021. Effect of mixed live yeast and lactic acid bacteria on in vitro fermentation with varying media pH using a high-grain or high-forage diet. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 101, 370–380, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2....
 
12.
Mao S., Zhang M., Liu J., Zhu W., 2013. Characterizing the microbial populations in the rumen: focusing on the methanogens and their relationship with methane emissions. Animal 7, 245–254, https://doi.org/10.1017/S17517....
 
13.
Marden J.P., Julien C., Monteils V., Auclair E., Moncoulon R., Bayourthe C., 2008. How does live yeast differ from sodium bicarbonate to stabilize ruminal pH in high-yielding dairy cows? J. Dairy Sci. 91, 3528-3535, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.20....
 
14.
Margin L., Gottardo F., Fiore E., Gianesella M., Martin B., Chevaux E., Cozzi G., 2018. Use of a live yeast strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a high-concentrate diet fed to finishing Charolasi bulls: effects on growth, slaughter performance, behaviour, and rumen environment. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 241, 84–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anif....
 
15.
McAllister T.A., Beauchemin K.A., Alazzeh A.Y., Baah J., Teather R.M., Stanford K., 2011. The use of direct fed microbials to mitigate pathogens and enhance production in cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 91, 193–211, https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas10....
 
16.
Miller D.N., Berry E.D., 2008. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on microbial populations and metabolism in the rumen of cattle fed a high-concentrate diet. J. Anim. Sci. 86, 389–400, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.20....
 
17.
Moré M.I., Swidsinski A., 2015. Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM 1-745 supports regeneration of the intestinal microbiota after diarrheic dysbiosis - a review. Clin. Exp. Gastroenterol. 237-255, https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S8....
 
18.
Morgavi D.P., Rathahao-Paris E., Popova M., Boccard J., Nielsen K.F., Boudra H., 2015. Rumen microbial communities influence metabolic phenotypes in lambs. Front. Microbiol. 6, 1060, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.....
 
19.
Newbold C.J., Wallace R.J., Chen X.B., McIntosh F.M., 1995. Different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae differ in their effects on ruminal bacterial numbers in vitro and in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 73, 1811–1818, https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7....
 
20.
Oeztuerk H., 2009. Effects of live and autoclaved yeast cultures on ruminal fermentation in vitro. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 18, 142–150, https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/....
 
21.
Patra A.K., Saxena J., 2010. A new perspective on the use of plant secondary metabolites to inhibit methanogenesis in the rumen. J. Phytochem. 71, 1198–1222, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phyt....
 
22.
Pinloche E., McEwan N., Marden J.-P., Bayourthe C., Newbold C.J., 2013. The effects of a probiotic yeast on the bacterial diversity and population structure in the rumen of cattle. PLoS One 8, e67824, https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
 
23.
Pitta D.W., Kumar S., Vecchiarelli B., Parmar N., Bittar C.M., Tempelman R.J., 2014. Bacterial diversity associated with feeding dry forage at different dietary concentrations in the rumen contents of Mehshana buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) using 16S pyrotags. J. Anaerobe 25, 31–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anae....
 
24.
Plata F.P., Mendoza G.D., Barcena R., Gonzalez S.S., Ortega M.E., 1994. Evaluation of yeast culture on ruminal fermentation and digestion in steers fed sugarcane tops. J. Anim. Sci. 72, 176–181, https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7....
 
25.
Rodriguez M.P., Mariezcurrena M.D., Mariezcurrena M.A., Lagunas B.C., Elghandour M.M.M.Y., Kholif A.M., Kholif A.E., Almaraz E.M., Salem A.Z.M., 2015. Influence of live cells or cells extract of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on in vitro gas production of a total mixed ration. Italian J. Anim. Sci. 14, 3713, https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2....
 
26.
Silberberg M., Chaucheyras-Durand F., Commun L., Mialon M., Monteils V., Mosoni P., Morgavi D., Martin C., 2013. Repeated acidosis challenges and live yeast supplementation shape rumen microbiota and fermentations and modulate inflammatory status in sheep. Animal 7, 1910–1920, https://doi.org/10.1017/S17517....
 
27.
Wallace R.J., Newbold C.J., 1993. Rumen fermentation and its manipulation: The development of yeast cultures as feed additives. In: T.P. Lyons (Editor), Biotechnology in the food industry (pp. 173-192). Alltech Technical Publications.
 
28.
Weimer P.J., Stevenson D.M., Mantovani H.C., Man S.L.C., 2010. Host specificity of the ruminal bacterial community in the dairy cow following near total exchange of ruminal contents. J. Dairy S. 93, 5902–5912, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.20....
 
ISSN:1230-1388
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top