ORIGINAL PAPER
The use of life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impact of production and feeding of conventional and genetically modified maize for broiler production in Argentina
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, The University of Reading, P.O. Box 237, Reading RG6 6AR, UK
 
 
Publication date: 2006-01-06
 
 
Corresponding author
R. H. Phipps   

School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, The University of Reading, P.O. Box 237, Reading RG6 6AR, UK
 
 
J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2006;15(1):71-82
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The paper presents the methods and results of a life-cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the production of maize grain from a conventional variety compared with maize grain from a variety genetically modified to be herbicide tolerant and insect protected and to contain an enhanced oil and lysine content, and its impact when fed to broiler chickens. The findings show that there are both environmental and human health benefits of growing GM maize including lower impacts on global warming, ozone depletion, freshwater ecotoxicity and human toxicity. However, when considered in terms of the use of maize as a feed input to broiler chicken production, the benefits of the GM alternative become negligible compared to the use of conventional maize.
 
CITATIONS (12):
1.
Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments
M. de Vries, I.J.M. de Boer
Livestock Science
 
2.
The use of life-cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impacts of growing genetically modified, nitrogen use-efficient canola
Alison Strange, Julian Park, Richard Bennett, Richard Phipps
Plant Biotechnology Journal
 
3.
Time to re-think the GMO revolution in agriculture
G.C. Rótolo, C. Francis, R.M. Craviotto, S. Viglia, A. Pereyra, S. Ulgiati
Ecological Informatics
 
4.
Studies on feeds from genetically modified plants (GMP) – Contributions to nutritional and safety assessment
G. Flachowsky, K. Aulrich, H. Böhme, I. Halle
Animal Feed Science and Technology
 
5.
What do Animal Nutritionists Expect from Plant Breeding?
Gerhard Flachowsky
Outlook on Agriculture
 
6.
Environmental impact of herbicide regimes used with genetically modified herbicide-resistant maize
Yann Devos, Mathias Cougnon, Sofie Vergucht, Robert Bulcke, Geert Haesaert, Walter Steurbaut, Dirk Reheul
Transgenic Research
 
7.
Genetic Engineering, Biofertilisation, Soil Quality and Organic Farming
Simone Bastianoni, Antonio Boggia, Cesare Castellini, Cinzia Di Stefano, Valentina Niccolucci, Emanuele Novelli, Luisa Paolotti, Antonio Pizzigallo
 
8.
Environmental impacts of transgenic Bt rice and non-Bt rice cultivars in northern Iran
Salman Dastan, Behzad Ghareyazie, Seyyed Pishgar
Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology
 
9.
Assessment of the life cycle of genetically modified and non-genetically modified rice cultivars
Salman Dastan, Behzad Ghareyazie, da Teixeira, Seyyed Pishgar-Komleh
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
 
10.
Environmental Impact of Agro-Food Industry and Food Consumption
Ines Andretta, Aline Remus, Carolina Franceschi, Catiane Orso, Marcos Kipper
 
11.
Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Production: Insights From a Systematic Review
Ines Andretta, Felipe Hickmann, Aline Remus, Carolina Franceschi, Alexandre Mariani, Catiane Orso, Marcos Kipper, Marie-Pierre Létourneau-Montminy, Candido Pomar
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
 
12.
DIFFERENT LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT METHODS AND CAUSES OF VARIATION IN ESTIMATES OF GLOBAL WARMING IN CHICKEN AND PORK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS: A CRITICAL SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Jéssica Silva, Carlo Giehl, Kátia Cardinal, Ines Andretta, Andréa Ribeiro
Livestock Science
 
ISSN:1230-1388
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top