ORIGINAL PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The intestinal microbiota plays an important role in the signalling between the gut and the liver. Intestinal bacteria produce short-chain fatty acids and other signalling molecules that affect internal communication. Changes in the composition of the gut microbiota can lead to alternations in this communication, which may ultimately lead to modifications in gene expression driven by epigenetic mechanisms. This study aimed to determine the effect of early microbiome modifications by bioactive substances delivered in ovo on changes in the relative abundance of bacteria in the intestinal contents and the level of expression and methylation of hepatic genes. On day 12 of incubation, a probiotic, a prebiotic, and a synbiotic were injected into the eggs of broiler and Green-legged Partridge-like chickens. Samples were collected post-mortem on day 42. Relative bacterial abundance was analysed using qPCR, gene expression analysis by RT-qPCR, and gene methylation using the MS-qPCR method. It was shown that the relative abundance of the analysed bacteria changed in both genotypes. An increase was observed in the number of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, and a decrease in the number of Escherichia coli in the Polish native breed. A significant increase was demonstrated in DNA methylation of the spleen associated tyrosine kinase gene (SYK) after prebiotic administration in both groups, and the nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 3 gene (NR4A3) in broiler chickens after administration of the synbiotic. Changes in gene methylation correlated with alterations in gene expression. Early stimulation of the gut microbiota at the embryonic stage led to changes in the intestinal microbial profile in adults.
FUNDING
The authors would also like to thank Clasado Biosciences for providing the prebiotic for research. The study was financed by grant UMO-2017/25/N/ NZ9/01822 funded by the National Science Centre (Poland). The manuscript was funded from a subsidy for the Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology granted by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland (BN-0/2023).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
 
REFERENCES (42)
1.
Albillos A., de Gottardi A., Rescigno M., 2020. The gut-liver axis in liver disease: pathophysiological basis for therapy. J. Hepatol. 72, 558–577, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep...
 
2.
Ansari I., Raddatz G., Gutekunst J. et al., 2020. The microbiota programs DNA methylation to control intestinal homeostasis and inflammation. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 610–619, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564...
 
3.
Aruwa C.E., Pillay C., Nyaga M.M., Sabiu S., 2021. Poultry gut health - microbiome functions, environmental impacts, microbiome engineering and advancements in characterization technologies. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 12, 119, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104...
 
4.
Ballou A.L., Ali R.A., Mendoza M.A., Ellis J.C., Hassan H.M., Croom W.J., Koci M.D., 2016. Development of the chick microbiome: how early exposure influences future microbial diversity. Front. Vet. Sci. 3, 2, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets....
 
5.
Bednarczyk M., Stadnicka K., Kozłowska I., Abiuso C., Tavaniello S., Dankowiakowska A., Sławińska A., Maiorano G., 2016. Influence of different prebiotics and mode of their administration on broiler chicken performance. Animal 10, 1271–1279, https://doi.org/10.1017/S17517...
 
6.
Berghof T.V.L., Parmentier H.K., Lammers A., 2013. Transgenerational epigenetic effects on innate immunity in broilers: an underestimated field to be explored? Poult. Sci. 92, 2904–2913, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.201...
 
7.
De Boever S., Vangestel C., De Backer P., Croubels S., Sys S.U., 2008. Identification and validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for gene expression in an intravenous LPS inflammation model in chickens. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 122, 312–317, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.veti...
 
8.
Choi K.Y., Lee T.K., Sul W.J., 2015. Metagenomic analysis of chicken gut microbiota for improving metabolism and health of chickens - a review. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 28, 1217–1225, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1...
 
9.
Christensen E.G., Licht T.R., Leser T.D., Bahl M.I., 2014. Dietary xylooligosaccharide stimulates intestinal bifidobacteria and lactobacilli but has limited effect on intestinal integrity in rats. BMC Res. Notes 7, 660, https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0...
 
10.
Clench M.H., Mathias J.R., 1995. The avian cecum: a review. Wilson Bull. 107, 93–121
 
11.
Crhanova M., Karasova D., Juricova H., Matiasovicova J., Jahodarova E., Kubasova T., Seidlerova Z., Cizek A., Rychlik I., 2019. Systematic culturomics shows that half of chicken caecal microbiota members can be grown in vitro except for two lineages of clostridiales and a single lineage of bacteroidetes. Microorganisms 7, 496, https://doi.org/10.3390/microo...
 
12.
Dijk W., Kersten S., 2014. Regulation of lipoprotein lipase by Angptl4. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 25, 146–155, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem....
 
13.
Dunislawska, A., Slawinska A., Siwek M., 2020. Hepatic DNA methylation in response to early stimulation of microbiota with Lactobacillus synbiotics in Broiler chickens. Genes 11, 579, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes1...
 
14.
Dunislawska A., Slawinska A., Stadnicka K., Bednarczyk M., Gulewicz P., Jozefiak D., Siwek M., 2017. Synbiotics for broiler chickens - in vitro design and evaluation of the influence on host and selected microbiota populations following in ovo delivery. PLoS One 12, e0168587, https://doi.org/10.1371/journa...
 
15.
Fackler M.J., McVeigh M., Mehrotra J., Blum M.A., Lange J., Lapides A., Garrett E., Argani P., Sukamar S., 2004. Quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR assay for the detection of promoter hypermethylation in multiple genes in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 64, 4442–4452, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5...
 
16.
Gibson, G.R., Wang X., 1994. Regulatory effects of bifidobacteria on the growth of other colonic bacteria. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 77, 412–420, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365...
 
17.
Hastings K.L., Green M.D., Gao B., Ganey P.E., Roth R.A., Burleson G.R., 2020. Beyond Metabolism: Role of the Immune System. in Hepatic Toxicity. Int. J. Toxicol. 39 (2),151–164, https://doi.org/10.1177/109158...
 
18.
Huijsdens X.W., Linskens R.K., Mak M., Meuwissen S.G.M., Vandenbroucke-Grauls C.M.J.E., Savelkoul P.H.M., 2002. Quantification of bacteria adherent to gastrointestinal mucosa by real-time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40, 4423–4427, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40...
 
19.
Jha R., Das R., Oak S., Mishra P., 2020. Probiotics (direct-fed microbials) in poultry nutrition and their effects on nutrient utilization, growth and laying performance, and gut health: a systematic review. Animals 10, 1863, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani101...
 
20.
Johnson T.J., Wannemuehler Y., Doetkott C., Johnson S.J., Rosenberger S.C., Nolan L.K., 2008. Identification of minimal predictors of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli virulence for use as a rapid diagnostic tool. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46, 3987–3996, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00...
 
21.
Jung S.J., Houde R., Baurhoo B., Zhao X., Lee B.H., 2008. Effects of galacto-oligosaccharides and a Bifidobacteria lactis-based probiotic strain on the growth performance and fecal microflora of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 87, 1694–1699, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.200...
 
22.
Koh A., Bäckhed F., 2020. From association to causality: the role of the gut microbiota and its functional products on host metabolism. Mol. Cell 78, 584–596, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2020.03.005
 
23.
Keessen E.C., Gaastra W., Lipman L.J.A., 2011. Clostridium difficile infection in humans and animals, differences and similarities. Vet. Microbiol. 153, 205–217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetm...
 
24.
Li C., Guo S., Zhang M., Gao J., Guo Y., 2015. DNA methylation and histone modification patterns during the late embryonic and early postnatal development of chickens. Poult. Sci. 94, 706–721, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev...
 
25.
Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D., 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using Real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408, https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2...
 
26.
Maniatis T., Fritsch E., Sambrook J., 1982. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. New York, NY (USA)
 
27.
Oakley B.B., Kogut M.H., 2016. Spatial and temporal changes in the broiler chicken cecal and fecal microbiomes and correlations of bacterial taxa with cytokine gene expression. Front. Vet. Sci. 3, 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets....
 
28.
Pedroso A.A., Batal A.B., Lee M.D., 2016. Effect of in ovo administration of an adult-derived microbiota on establishment of the intestinal microbiome in chickens. Am. J. Vet. Res. 77, 514–526, https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.7...
 
29.
Penders J., Vink C., Driessen C., London N., Thijs C., Stobberingh E.E., 2005. Quantification of Bifidobacterium spp., Escherichia coli and Clostridium difficile in faecal samples of breast-fed and formula-fed infants by real-time PCR. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 243, 141–147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fems...
 
30.
Rupnik M., Wilcox M.H., Gerding D.N., 2009. Clostridium difficile infection: new developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7, 526–536, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicr...
 
31.
Salazar N., Gueimonde M., Hernández-Barranco A.M., Ruas-Madiedo P., de los Reyes-Gavilán C.G., 2008. Exopolysaccharides produced by intestinal Bifidobacterium strains act as fermentable substrates for human intestinal bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 4737–4745, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00...
 
32.
Sevane N., Bialade F., Velasco S., Rebolé A., Rodríguez M.L., Ortiz L.T., Cañón J., Dunner S., 2014. Dietary inulin supplementation modifies significantly the liver transcriptomic profile of broiler chickens. PLoS One 9, e98942, https://doi.org/10.1371/journa...
 
33.
Shoaf K., Mulvey G.L., Armstrong G.D., Hutkins R.W., 2006. Prebiotic galactooligosaccharides reduce adherence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to tissue culture cells. Infect. Immun. 74, 6920–6928, https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01...
 
34.
Siwek M., Slawinska A., Stadnicka K., Bogucka J., Dunislawska A., Bednarczyk M., 2018. Prebiotics and synbiotics - in ovo delivery for improved lifespan condition in chicken. BMC Vet. Res. 14, 402, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917...
 
35.
Skraban J., Dzeroski S., Zenko B., Tusar L., Rupnik M., 2013. Changes of poultry faecal microbiota associated with Clostridium difficile colonisation. Vet. Microbiol. 165, 416–424, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetm...
 
36.
Slawinska A., Dunislawska A., Plowiec A., Radomska M., Lachmanska J., Siwek M., Tavaniello S., Maiorano G., 2019. Modulation of microbial communities and mucosal gene expression in chicken intestines after galactooligosaccharides delivery in ovo. PLoS One 14, e0212318, https://doi.org/10.1371/journa...
 
37.
Stanley D., Hughes R.J., Geier M.S., Moore R.J., 2016. Bacteria within the gastrointestinal tract microbiota correlated with improved growth and feed conversion: challenges presented for the identification of performance enhancing probiotic bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 7, 187, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb....
 
38.
Torres-Hernandez A., Wang W., Nikiforov Y. et al., 2019. Targeting SYK signaling in myeloid cells protects against liver fibrosis and hepatocarcinogenesis. Oncogene 38, 4512–4526, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388...
 
39.
Vandesompele J., De Preter K., Pattyn F., Poppe B., Van Roy N., De Paepe A., Speleman F., 2002. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 3, research0034.1, https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-200...
 
40.
Wei S., Morrison M., Yu Z., 2013. Bacterial census of poultry intestinal microbiome. Poult. Sci. 92, 671–683, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.201...
 
41.
Yadav S., Jha R., 2019. Strategies to modulate the intestinal microbiota and their effects on nutrient utilization, performance, and health of poultry. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 10, 2, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104...
 
42.
Zhang N., 2015. Epigenetic modulation of DNA methylation by nutrition and its mechanisms in animals. Anim. Nutr. 1, 144–151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anin...
 
ISSN:1230-1388
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top