CC-BY 4.0

The effect of addition of yellow lupin seeds (Lupinus luteus L.) to laying hen diets on performance and egg quality parameters

A. Rutkowski 1,  
M. Hejdysz 1  ,  
S. Kaczmarek 1,  
M. Adamski 2,  
Poznań University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Management, Wołyńska 33, 60-637 Poznań, Poland
University of Technology and Life Sciences in Bydgoszcz, Department of Poultry Breeding Mazowiecka 28, 85-084 Bydgoszcz, Poland
Poznań University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal Breeding and Product Quality Assessment, Złotniki, Słoneczna 1, 62-002 Suchy Las, Poland
Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Quality, Chełmońskiego 38C, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland
J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2017;26(3):247–256
Publish date: 2017-09-08
The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of a new variety of yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus L.) var. Mister seeds in laying hens diet on their performance and egg quality parameters. The experiment was performed on 17-week old 360 Hy-Line Brown hens housed in cages. Hens were randomly assigned to five treatments, each with 24 replications. Starting from 21 week of age birds were fed five different diets: control (without lupin seeds) and with 10, 15, 20 and 25% inclusion of yellow lupin seeds. Dietary inclusion of 25% lupin seeds significantly decreased the mean laying rate and egg weight. Also, the lowest dietary consumption and the worst feed conversion ratio were found in birds fed diet with 25% lupin seeds addition; the best results were found in the control animals. As the yellow lupin seeds content in the diets increased, the pH value of yolk and albumen increased, also Haugh unit scores and yolk pigmentation were significantly higher but shell thickness and strength was decreased. So, the inclusion of up to 20% yellow lupin seeds into diet did not decrease laying rate and egg weight. In line with the increasing lupin content in diets the egg quality was deteriorated (except for yolk pigmentation).
M. Hejdysz   
Poznań University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Management, Wołyńska 33, 60-637 Poznań, Poland
1. Adamski M., 2008. Relationships between the morphological composition of eggs and the hatchability of chicks of selected bird species (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. (Rozprawy) Zootech. Wydawnictwa Uczelniane Uniwersytetu Technologiczno-Przyrodniczego. Bydgoszcz (PL), pp. 1–102.
2. AOAC International, 2005. Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC International. 18th Edition. MD (USA).
3. Calik J., 2013. Changes in quality traits of eggs from Yellowleg partridge (Ż-33) laying hens depending on storage conditions of eggs (in Polish). Zywn.-Nauka Technol. Jakosc 2, 87, 73–79.
4. Dvořák P., Straková E., Kunová J., Kunová V., 2007. Egg yolk colour depends upon the composition of the feeding mixture for laying hens. Acta Vet. Brno 76, 121–127, https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200776010121.
5. Gdala J., 1998. Composition, properties and nutritive value of dietary fibre of legume seeds. A review. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 7, 131–150, https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/69204/1998.
6. Gdala J., Buraczewska L., 1996. Chemical composition and carbohydrate content of seeds from several lupin species. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 5, 403–416, https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/69618/1996.
7. Hammershoj M., Steenfeldt S., 2005. Effect of blue lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) in organic layer diets and supplementation with foraging material on egg production and some egg quality parameters. Poultry Sci. 84, 723–733, https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.5.723
8. Hang W., Lantz H.-J., 1983. Sensitive method for the rapid determination of phytate in cereals and cereal products. J. Sci. Food Agric. 34, 1423–1426, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740341217.
9. Hejdysz M., Kaczmarek S.A., Rutkowski A., 2015. Factors affecting the nutritional value of pea (Pisum sativum) for broilers. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 24, 252–259, https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/65631/2015.
10. Hejdysz M., Kaczmarek S.A., Adamski M., Rutkowski A., 2017. Influence of graded inclusion of raw and extruded pea (Pisum sativum L.) meal on the performance and nutrient digestibility of broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Techol. 230, 114–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.05.016.
11. Hejdysz M., Kaczmarek S.A., Rutkowski A., 2016. Extrusion cooking improves the metabolisable energy of faba beans and the amino acid digestibility in broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 212, 100–111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.12.008.
12. Hughes R.J., Kocher A., 1998. Nutritive value of lupins for layers. Proc. Aust. Poult. Sci. Sym. 1998, Article No. 10, 140–143.
13. Jamroz D., Kubizna J., 2008. Harmful substances in legume seeds – their negative and beneficial properties. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 11, 389–404.
14. Kaczmarek S.A., Cowieson A.J., Hejdysz M., Rutkowski A., 2015. Microbial phytase improves performance and bone traits in broilers fed diets based on soybean meal and containing lupin meal. Anim. Prod. Sci. 56, 1669–1676, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14856.
15. Kaczmarek S.A., Kasprowicz-Potocka M., Hejdysz M., Mikuła R., Rutkowski A., 2014. The nutritional value of narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) for broilers. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 23, 160–166, https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/65705/2014.
16. Kasprowicz-Potocka M., Zaworska A., Kaczmarek S.A., Rutkowski A., 2016. The nutritional value of narrow-leafed lupine (Lupinus angustifolius) for fattening pigs. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 70, 209–223, https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2016.1150238.
17. Knudsen K.E.B., 1997. Carbohydrate and lignin contents of plant materials used in animal feeding. Anim. Feed Sci. Techol. 67, 319–338, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00009-6.
18. Knudsen K.E.B., 2014. Fiber and nonstarch polysaccharide content and variation in common crops used in broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 93, 2380–2393, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-03902.
19. Kocher A., Choct M., Hughes R.J., Broz J., 2000. Effect of food enzymes on utilisation of lupin carbohydrates by broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 41, 75–82, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660086448.
20. Krawczyk M., Przywitowski M., Mikulski D., 2015. Effect of yellow lupine (L. luteus) on the egg yolk fatty acid profile, the physicochemical and sensory properties of eggs and laying hen performance. Poult. Sci. 94, 1360–1367, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev092.
21. Laudadio V., Tufarelli V., 2011a. Dehulled micronised lupin (Lupinus albus L. cv. Multitalia) as the main protein source for broilers: influence on growth performance, carcass traits and meat fatty acid composition. J. Sci. Food Agric. 91, 2081–2087, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4426
22. Laudadio V., Tufarelli V., 2011b. Influence of substituting dietary soybean meal for dehulled-micronized lupin (Lupinus albus cv. Multitalia) on early phase laying hens production and egg quality. Livest. Sci. 140, 184–188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.029.
23. Mierlita D., 2013. Effect of partial substitution of soybean meal with lupine seeds in feeding laying hens on production and economic performance. Bull. UASVM Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 70, 37–44, https://doi.org/10.15835/buasvmcn-asb:70:1:9290.
24. Olkowski B., 2011. Lupin as primary protein source in young broiler\ chicken diets: Effect of enzymes preparations catalysing degradation of non-starch polysaccharides or phytates. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 27, 341–347, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0464-x.
25. Olkowski B.I., Classen H.L., Wojnarowicz C., Olkowski A.A., 2005. Feeding high levels of lupine seeds to broiler chickens: plasma micronutrient status in the context of digesta viscosity and morphometric and ultrastructural changes in the gastrointestinal tract. Poult. Sci. 84, 1707–1715, https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.11.1707.
26. Rutkowski A., Kaczmarek S.A., Hejdysz M., Jamroz D., 2016. Effect of extrusion on nutrients digestibility, metabolizable energy and nutritional value of yellow lupine seeds for broiler chickens. Ann. Anim. Sci. 16, 1059–1072, https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2016-0025.
27. Rutkowski A., Kaczmarek S.A., Hejdysz M., Nowaczewski S., Jamroz D., 2015. Concentrates made from legume seeds (Lupinus angustifolius, Lupinus luteus and Pisum sativum) and rapeseed meal as protein sources in laying hen diets. Ann. Anim. Sci. 15, 129–142, https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2014-0061.
28. Sandberg A.-S., 2002. Bioavailability of minerals in legumes. Br. J. Nutr. 88, 281–285, https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN/2002718.
29. Sauvant D., Perez J.-M., Tran G. (Editors), 2004. Tables of Composition and Nutritional Value of Feed Materials. Wageningen Academic Publishers (The Netherlands) and INRA, Paris (France).
30. Sikder A.C., Chowdhury S.D., Rashid M.H., Sarker A.K., Das S.C., 1998. Use of dried carrot meal (DCM) in laying hen diet for egg yolk pigmentation. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 11, 239– 244, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1998.239.
31. Smulikowska S., Rutkowski A. (Editors), 2005. Recommended Allowances and Nutritive Value of Feedstuffs. Poultry Feeding Standards (in Polish). 4th Edition.The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, PAS, Jabłonna (Poland).
32. Wasilewko J., Buraczewska L., 1999. Chemical composition including content of amino acids, minerals and alkaloids in seeds of three lupin species cultivated in Poland. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 8, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/68803/1999.
33. Watkins B.A., Mirosh L.W., 1987. White lupin as a protein source for layers. Poult. Sci. 66, 1798–1806, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0661798.
34. Wells R.G., 1968. The measurement of certain egg quality characteristics: a review. In: T.C. Carter (Editor). Egg Quality. A Study of the Hen’s Egg. Oliver and Boyd, Edinbourgh (UK), pp. 207–250.
35. Williams K.C., 1992. Some factors affecting albumen quality with particular reference to Haugh units score. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 48, 5–16.
36. Zalewski K., Lahuta L.B., Horbowicz M., 2001. The effect of soil drought on the composition of carbohydrates in yellow lupin seeds and triticale kernels. Acta Physiol. Plant. 23, 73–78, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-001-0025-x.
1. Effect of increasing levels of raw and extruded narrow-leafed lupin seeds in broiler diet on performance parameters, nutrient digestibility and AMEN value of diet
M. Hejdysz, S. Kaczmarek, M. Kubiś, D. Jamroz, M. Kasprowicz-Potocka, A. Zaworska, A. Rutkowski
Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences