CC-BY 4.0

Impact of humic acid as an organic additive on ruminal fermentation constituents, blood parameters and milk production in goats and their kids growth rate

H. M. El-Zaiat 1  ,  
A. S. Morsy 2,  
M. M. Anwer 3,  
Alexandria University, Faculty of Agriculture, Animal Production Department, P.O Box 21545, Alexandria, Egypt
Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute, Livestock Research Department, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, New Borg El-Arab, P.O. Box 21934, Alexandria, Egypt
Agriculture Research Centre, Animal Production Research Institute, Sheep and Goats Research Department, Dokki, P.O. Box 12618, Giza, Egypt
J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2018;27(2):105–113
Publish date: 2018-06-19
Impact of humic acid (HA) on ruminal fermentation characteristics, blood parameters and milk yield in goats and growth rate of their kids was determined. Twenty late pregnant Barki goats (45.4 ± 1.5 kg body weight) were allocated into two treatments (10 goats per treatment), housed individually in closed pens (one goat per pen) and fed a total mixed ration (TMR) twice a day. The TMR was composed of 400 g roughage and 600 g concentrate mixture. Goats were fed either TMR without HA (control diet, CTL) or orally drenched with HA at a dose of 2 g · d–1 per goat (HA diet) for 14 days prepartum and 56 days postpartum. The results revealed that HA increased ruminal pH, acetate and propionate proportions, while ammonia concentration and protozoa number were decreased. Administration of HA reduced daily dry matter intake and total faecal egg count. Animals treated with HA were characterised with increased blood total protein, globulin and glucose levels, while reduced blood urea nitrogen, cholesterol, non-esterified free fatty acids and β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations were stated. Milk, fat, lactose and protein yields increased, while milk urea nitrogen and somatic cell count decreased with HA treatment. Milk fat and protein contents were increased for goats treated with HA. Kids reared by goats treated with HA had increased body weight and 31% greater daily weight gain than CTL ones. So, HA could be efficiently used as a promising organic additive to modulate ruminal fermentation pattern. Administration of HA improved milk yield and its quality in goats, and also growth rate of their kids with no adverse effects on animal health.
H. M. El-Zaiat   
Alexandria University, Faculty of Agriculture, Animal Production Department, P.O Box 21545, Alexandria, Egypt
1. Abo-Zeid H.M., El-Zaiat H.M., Morsy A.S., Attia M.F.A., Abaza M.A., Sallam S.M.A., 2017. Effects of replacing dietary maize grains with increasing levels of sugar beet pulp on rumen fermentation constituents and performance of growing buffalo calves. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 234, 128–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anif....
2. Allen M.S., Bradford B.J., Oba M., 2009. The hepatic oxidation theory of the control of feed intake and its application to ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 87, 3317–3334, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.20....
3. Ametaj B.N., Emmanuel D.G.V., Zebeli Q., Dunn S.M., 2009. Feeding high proportions of barley grain in a total mixed ration perturbs diurnal patterns of plasma metabolites in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 92, 1084–1091, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.20....
4. AOAC International, 2006. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. Current through revision 1. 18th Edition. Gaithersburg, MD (USA).
5. Bernard J.K., 1997. Milk production and composition responses to the source of protein supplements in diets containing wheat middlings. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 938–942, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0....
6. Dabovich L.A., Hulbert L., Rudine A., Kim S., Ji F., McGlone J., 2003. Evaluation of nutriceutical effects on pig immunity: effects of Promox. In: Proceedings of Annual Meeting of Southern Section of American Society of Animal Science. Mobile, AL (USA), abstract no. 114.
7. Degirmencioglu T., Ozbilgin S., 2013. Effect of administration of humic acid on somatic cell count and total bacteria in Saanen goats. Int. J. Vet. Sci. 2, 151–154.
8. Dehority B.A., 1993. Laboratory Manual for Classification and Morphology of Rumen Ciliate Protozoa. CRC Press Inc. Boca Raton, FL (USA).
9. Galip N., Polat U., Biricik H., 2010. Effects of supplemental humic acid on ruminal fermentation and blood variables in rams. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 9, e74, https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2....
10. Ji F., McGlone J.J., Kim S.W., 2006. Effects of dietary humic substances on pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and ammonia emission. J. Anim. Sci. 84, 2482–2490, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.20....
11. Kaneko J.J., Harvey J.W., Bruss M.L., 2008. Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals. Academic Press (Elsevier). Burlington, MA (USA).
12. Konitzer K., Voigt S., 1963. Direct determination of ammonium in blood and tissue extracts by means of the phenol by chlorite reaction (in German). Clin. Chim. Acta 8, 5–11.
13. Manso T., Bodas R., Vieira C., Mantecón A.R., Castro T., 2011. Feeding vegetable oils to lactating ewes modifies the fatty acid profile of suckling lambs. Animal 5, 1659–1667, https://doi.org/10.1017/S17517....
14. McMurphy C.P., Duff G.C., Harris M.A., Sanders S.R., Chirase N.K., Bailey C.R., Ibrahim R.M., 2009. Effect of humic/fulvic acid in beef cattle finishing diets on animal performance, ruminal ammonia and plasma urea nitrogen concentration. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 35, 97–100, https://doi.org/10.1080/097121....
15. NRC (National Research Council), 2007.Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids. The National Academies Press. Washington, DC (USA), https://doi.org/10.17226/11654.
16. Onodera R., Yamaguchi H., Eguchi C., Kandatsu M., 1977. Limits of survival of the mingled rumen bacteria in the washed cell suspension of rumen ciliate protozoa. Agric. Biol. Chem. 41, 2465–2466, https://doi.org/10.1080/000213....
17. Ramos-Morales E., Arco-Pérez A., Martín-García A.I., Yáñez- Ruiz D.R., Frutos P., Hervás G., 2014. Use of stomach tubing as an alternative to rumen cannulation to study ruminal fermentation and microbiota in sheep and goats. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 198, 57–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anif....
18. Sharma N., Singh N.K., Bhadwal M.S., 2011. Relationship of somatic cell count and mastitis: an overview. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 24, 429–438, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2....
19. Tietz P.S., Holman R.T., Miller L.J., LaRusso N.F., 1995. Isolation and characterization of rat cholangiocyte vesicles enriched in apical or basolateral plasma membrane domains. Biochemistry 34, 15436–15443, https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0004....
20. Trckova M., Matlova L., Hudcova H., Faldyna M., Zraly Z., Dvorska L., Beran V., Pavlik I., 2005. Peat as a feed supplement for animals: a literature review. Vet. Med.50, 361–377, https://doi.org/10.17221/5635-....
21. Ueno H., Gonçalves P., 1998. Manual for the diagnosis of ruminant helminthes. 4th Edition (in Portuguese). Japan International Cooperation Agency. Tokyo (Japan).
22. Van Soest P.J., 1973. Collaborative study of acid-detergent fiber and lignin. J. AOAC 56, 781–784.
23. Van Soest P.J., 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2nd Edition. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, NY (USA).
24. Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A., 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74, 3583–3597, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0....
25. Váradyová Z., Kišidayová S., Jalč D., 2009. Effect of humic acid on fermentation and ciliate protozoan population in rumen fluid of sheep in vitro. J. Sci. Food Agric. 89, 1936–1941, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3....
26. Wang Q., Chen Y.J., Yoo J.S., Kim H.J., Cho J.H., Kim I.H., 2008. Effects of supplemental humic substances on growth performance, blood characteristics and meat quality in finishing pigs. Livest. Sci. 117, 270–274, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livs....
27. Zamiri M.J., Qotbi A., Izadifard J., 2001. Effect of daily oxytocin injection on milk yield and lactation length in sheep. Small Ruminant Res.40, 179–185, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-....