ORIGINAL PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Intestinal microbiota plays an important role in nutrition, metabolism and immunity in all mammals. It is comprised of diverse populations of bacteria and other microorganisms whose abundances are impacted by both environmental and host genetic factors. However, the understandings of the intestinal microbiota in different pig breeds remain largely undefined. To examine the differences in intestinal microflora between two pig breeds with different genetic backgrounds under the same environment, 16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing were performed to investigate the structural composition and potential functions of microbial communities in rectum and caecum of Erhualian and Sushan pigs. The results revealed that the diversity of intestinal microflora in two pig breeds was similar, but the abundance of specific intestinal microflora was different. At the phylum level, the dominant bacteria in caecum and rectum of Erhualian and Sushan pigs were Firmicutes, Acidobacteria and Bacteroides, but their expression abundance was different. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in Erhualian pigs were higher than those in Sushan pigs. At the genus level, Lactobacillus was the most abundant in caecum of Sushan pigs (6.83%) and rectum of Erhualian pigs (9.61%), while Ruminococcaceae UCG-005 were dominant in caecum of Erhualian pigs (10.89%) and Streptococcus in rectum of Sushan pigs (24.89%). This study further confirmed the existence of specific microbial community diversity and abundance in different pig breeds. The microbial community diversity and abundance in Erhualian and Sushan pigs were closely related to pig fat deposition and nutrient absorption.
FUNDING
This study was supported by China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
 
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Bergen W.G., 2015. Small-intestinal or colonic microbiota as a potential amino acid source in animals. Amino Acids 47, 251–258, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726....
 
2.
Bian G., Ma S., Zhu Z. et al., 2016. Age, introduction of solid feed and weaning are more important determinants of gut bacterial succession in piglets than breed and nursing mother as revealed by a reciprocal cross-fostering model. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1566–1577, https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2....
 
3.
Chen S., Zhou Y., Chen Y., Gu J., 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinf....
 
4.
Choy Y.Y., Quifer-Rada P., Holstege D.M., Frese S.A., Calvert C.C., Mills D.A., La-muela-Raventos R.M., Waterhouse A.L., 2014. Phenolic metabolites and substantial microbiome changes in pig feces by ingesting grape seed proanthocyanidins. Food Funct. 5, 2298–2308, https://doi.org/10.1039/c4fo00....
 
5.
Diao H., Yan H.L., Xiao Y. et al., 2016. Intestinal microbiota could transfer host Gut characteristics from pigs to mice. BMC Microbiol. 16, 238, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866....
 
6.
Dowarah R., Verma A.K., Agarwal N., Patel B.H.M., Singh P., 2017. Effect of swine based probiotic on performance, diarrhoea scores, intestinal microbiota and gut health of grower-finisher crossbred pigs. Livest. Sci. 195, 74–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livs....
 
7.
Du J., Yuan Z., Ma Z., Song J., Xie X., Chen Y., 2014. KEGG-PATH: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes-based pathway analysis using a path analysis model. Mol. BioSyst. 10, 2441–2447, https://doi.org/10.1039/c4mb00....
 
8.
Edgar R.C., 2013. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10, 996–998, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.....
 
9.
Guo X., Xia X., Tang R., Zhou J., Zhao H., Wang K., 2008. Development of a real-time PCR method for Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in faeces and its application to quantify intestinal population of obese and lean pigs. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 47, 367–373, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472....
 
10.
Kemp P.F., Aller J.Y., 2004. Bacterial diversity in aquatic and other environments: what 16S rDNA libraries can tell us. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 47, 161–177, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-....
 
11.
Kim H.B., Borewicz K., White B.A., Singer R.S., Sreevatsan S., Tu Z.J., Isaacson R.E., 2011. Longitudinal investigation of the age-related bacterial diversity in the feces of commercial pigs. Vet. Microbiol. 153, 124–133, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetm....
 
12.
Kim H.B., Isaacson R.E., 2015. The pig gut microbial diversity: understanding the pig gut microbial ecology through the next generation high throughput sequencing. Vet. Microbiol. 177, 242–251, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetm....
 
13.
Langille M.G., Zaneveld J., Caporaso J.G. et al., 2013. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 814–821, https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.26....
 
14.
Magoč T., Salzberg S.L., 2011. FLASH: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinf....
 
15.
Mathur R., Barlow G.M., 2015. Obesity and the microbiome. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 9, 1087–1099, https://doi.org/10.1586/174741....
 
16.
Niu Q., Li P., Hao S., Kim S.W., Du T., Hua J., Huang R., 2019. Characteristics of gut microbiota in sows and their relationship with apparent nutrient digestibility. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 870, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20....
 
17.
Pajarillo E.A.B., Chae J.P., Balolong M.P., Kim H.B., Seo K.-S., Kang D.-K., 2014. Pyrosequencing-based analysis of fecal microbial communities in three purebred pig lines. J. Microbiol. 52, 646–651, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275....
 
18.
R Core Team, 2020. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna (Austria), https://www.r-project.org.
 
19.
Robinson M.D., McCarthy D.J., Smyth G.K., 2010. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinf....
 
20.
Segata N., Izard J., Waldron L., Gevers D., Miropolsky L., Garrett W.S., Huttenhower C., 2011. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 12, R60, https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-201....
 
21.
Schloss P.D., Westcott S.L., Ryabin T. et al., 2009. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 7537–7541, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01....
 
22.
Simpson J.M., McCracken V.J., White B.A., Gaskins H.R., Mackie R.I., 1999. Application of denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis for the analysis of the porcine gastrointestinal microbiota. J. Microbiol. Methods 36, 167–179, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-....
 
23.
Thaiss C.A., Zmora N., Levy M., Elinav E., 2016. The microbiome and innate immunity. Nature 535, 65–74, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature....
 
24.
White J.R., Nagarajan N., Pop M., 2009. Statistical methods for detecting differentially abundant features in clinical metagenomic samples. PLoS Comp. Biol. 5, e1000352, https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
 
25.
Woting A., Pfeiffer N., Loh G., Klaus S., Blaut M., 2014. Clostridium ramosum promotes high-fat diet-induced obesity in gnotobiotic mouse models. mBio 5, e01530-14, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.0....
 
26.
Xiao Y., Kong F., Xiang Y., Zhou W., Wang J., Yang H., Zhang G., Zhao J., 2018. Comparative biogeography of the gut microbiome between Jinhua and Landrace pigs. Sci. Rep. 8, 5985, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598....
 
27.
Yang H., Xiao Y., Wang J., Xiang Y., Gong Y., Wen X., Li D., 2018. Core gut microbiota in Jinhua pigs and its correlation with strain, farm and weaning age. J. Microbiol. 56, 346–355, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275....
 
28.
Yang L., Bian G., Su Y., Zhu W., 2014. Comparison of faecal microbial community of Lantang, Bama, Erhualian, Meishan, Xiaomeishan, Duroc, Landrace, and Yorkshire sows. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 27, 898–906, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2....
 
ISSN:1230-1388
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top